![]() ![]() I imagine there is some smooth Bitbucket integration stuff with this, similar to the GitHub/GitHub Desktop connection. You might be compelled by Sourcetree if you’re a big Bitbucket user because they are both Atlassian products. It seems highly feature-rich, but I think my favorite part is the dark-with-rainbow-accent-colors theme. Upgrading (monthly cost) to get the in-app merge conflict tool seems worth it, but you also have to upgrade to access private repos. ![]() pull requests) feel like first-class citizens, but it will still happily work with any Git repo. It’s deeply integrated into GitHub so it makes GitHubb-y things (e.g. I had some gripes with the 1.0 version in that its terminology was weird (to me) and seemed to vastly deviate from Git, which was more confusing than it was worth (again, to me). This is a 2.0 of the original GitHub Desktop. It’s free and actively developed, incredibly. They’ve been around a long time and continuously improve, which I always respect. I’m not sure the exact release dates of all these, but I feel like Tower was an early player here. I’ve used Tower for ages and it’s the one used the most. There's some weird gatekeeping tendencies centered around the command line. Lots of perfectly amazing programmers like working with GUIs, and it's perfectly fine. ![]() No matter how much you love the CLI, don't GUI-shame. Lemme round up what look like the major players for Git GUIs these days. User Interface, or you know, software you can see things and click stuff), and some near pure-designers I know prefer working with the command line for Git. There are lots of options! Some of the deepest programmer nerds I know prefer to use GUIs for Git (Graphic Git is command-line-driven software, but that doesn’t mean you have to use the command line to make it work. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |